ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Personalization of closed-chain shoulder models yields high kinematic accuracy for multiple motions.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of exercise prehabilitation on upper extremity range of motions, functionality and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a prospective clinical trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The shoulder joint complex is prone to musculoskeletal issues, such as rotator cuff-related pain, which affect two-thirds of adults and often result in suboptimal treatment outcomes. Current musculoskeletal models used to understand shoulder biomechanics are limited by challenges in personalization, inaccuracies in predicting joint and muscle loads, and an inability to simulate anatomically accurate motions. To address these deficiencies, we developed a novel, personalized modeling framework capable of calibrating subject-specific joint centers and functional axes for the shoulder complex. Methods: We developed a novel personalized modeling framework utilizing the Joint Model Personalization (JMP) Tool from the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline, incorporating in vivo biplane fluoroscopy data of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints. Initially, open-chain scapula-only models with 3, 4, and 5 degrees of freedom (DOFs) were created and optimized using synthetic marker data derived from subject-specific geometry. Subsequently, closed-chain shoulder models including scapula, clavicle, and humerus were constructed and optimized through a two-stage personalization approach. Model accuracy and generalizability were assessed using marker distance errors and leave-one-out cross-validation across multiple shoulder motions. Results: Increasing the number of scapula DOFs in open-chain models improved kinematic accuracy, with the 5 DOF scapula model yielding the lowest marker distance errors (average: 0.8 mm; maximum: 5.2 mm). The closed-chain shoulder model demonstrated high accuracy (average: 0.9 mm; maximum: 5.7 mm) and consistency across subject in cross-validation tests (average marker distance errors = 1.0-1.4 mm). Models personalized with synthetic noise representative of skin-based marker data resulted in slightly increased, yet acceptable marker errors (average: 3.4 mm). Conclusion: Our personalized, closed-chain shoulder modeling framework significantly improves the accuracy and anatomical fidelity of shoulder kinematic simulations compared to existing approaches. This framework minimizes errors in joint kinematics and provides a foundation for future models incorporating personalized musculature and advanced simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.