ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2025
Prediction of AF Ablation Results by Advanced Left Atrial Function Assessment Using Strain Analysis and Left Atrial Appendage Emptying Velocity.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia with significant morbidity. Despite advancements in rhythm control strategies and ablation procedures, approximately 30 % of patients with paroxysmal AF experience recurrence, necessitating predictive tools for better patient stratification. This study evaluates the role of left atrial strain (LAS) and left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAeV) as predictors of recurrence, aiming to improve procedural outcomes and patient selection. Methods: A prospective cohort of 32 patients with paroxysmal AF and structurally normal hearts, underwent either cryo- or radiofrequency ablation at a single tertiary center. Pre-ablation evaluations included LAS analysis via transthoracic echocardiography and LAAeV measurement via transesophageal echocardiography. Patients were followed for up to one year post-ablation, with recurrence defined as AF episodes lasting >30 seconds beyond a three-month blanking period. Statistical analyses assessed the predictive value of LAS and LAAeV, individually and in combination. Results: AF recurrence occurred in 21.9 % of the cohort. Pre-ablation left atrial strain (LAS) values (global LAS ≥33.56 %, sensitivity 85.7 %, specificity 70 %, AUC = 81.4 %, P < 0.05) and left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAeV) (≥42.7 cm/s, sensitivity: 100 %, specificity: 87 %, AUC = 94 %, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with freedom from recurrence. The combination of LAS and LAAeV improved predictive accuracy to 100 % sensitivity and 94 % specificity (P value < 0.001). Post-ablation LAS showed inconsistent predictive value, with only apical-2 chamber global LAS achieving statistical significance (P = 0.002). Functional recovery of the left atrium post-ablation was minimal, suggesting limited reversibility of atrial remodeling. Conclusion: Pre-ablation assessment of LAS and LAAeV provides robust predictors of recurrence in patients undergoing AF ablation. Incorporating these metrics into standard pre-procedural evaluation could optimize patient selection and improve ablation outcomes. Further studies are required to validate age-specific cutoff values and evaluate long-term implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.