Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861833›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025

Safety Profile and Predictors of Adverse Events of Incadronate Disodium in Treating Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases: A Retrospective Study.

Shihan Zhou, Mingxia Jiang, Jiaxuan Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Mingxiao Li, Maiyue He, Nilupai Abudureheiyimu, Wenna Wang, Xiuwen Guan, Fei Ma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shihan ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mingxia JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxuan LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mengqi ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mingxiao LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Maiyue HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Nilupai AbudureheiyimuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wenna WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiuwen GuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Fei MaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Binghe XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Mocelular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0234-2747
Qiao LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Bone metastasis is a common complication in advanced breast cancer. Bisphosphonates like incadronate disodium have shown potential in reducing bone resorption and skeletal-related events. We therefore performed a retrospective study to evaluate the safety profile of incadronate disodium in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted involving 84 breast cancer patients with bone metastases who received incadronate disodium treatment between February 2022 and August 2024 in our center. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dental-related issues and acute phase reactions, with an analysis of the associated risk factors. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of other adverse events. Adverse events were recorded during treatment and within 90 days post-treatment. Results: Dental-related issues were observed in 33.3% of patients and only one (1.2%) developed medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Higher risk was significantly associated with prolonged treatment duration (OR = 4.33, 95% CI:1.21-15.50), secondary bone metastases (OR = 6.3, 95% CI:1.58-25.00), and lower hemoglobin levels (OR = 4.16, 95% CI:1.31-13.2) at multivariate analysis. 26.2% patients occurred acute phase reactions. Higher medication doses (OR = 1.41, 95% CI:1.07-2.05), multiple metastatic sites (OR = 4.22, 95% CI:1.39-15.89) and lower hemoglobin levels (OR = 3.27, 95% CI:1.21-9.22) were significant in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Rare adverse effects included renal dysfunction (1.2%) and hypocalcemia (4.76%). Conclusion: Incadronate disodium demonstrates a favorable safety profile for treating bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Identified risk factors, such as prolonged treatment duration and lower hemoglobin levels, highlight the need for intensified dental health management and personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

adverse effectbisphosphonatebone metastasisbreast cancerincadronate disodium

Identifiers

PMID40861833
PMCPMC12375327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.