ArticleQatar medical journal2025
Evaluating the outcome of Ambulances Collisions Review Panel in Middle Eastern environment using epidemiological supervised and unsupervised machine learning analyses.
Article in Qatar medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ambulance collisions pose a significant occupational risk to personnel, patients, and the public. Despite ongoing efforts to improve safety measures, the complex nature of emergency response operations continues to pose challenges in reducing collision risks. Objective: This study investigates the role of the dedicated Vehicle Collisions Review Panel at Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service (HMCAS) in identifying, understanding, and managing risks associated with ambulance collisions. Methods: A retrospective quantitative analysis of HMCAS ambulance collision records from 2023 was conducted using descriptive and bivariate analyses, along with supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques - including multinomial logistic regression (MLR), decision tree (DT) analysis, association rule mining (ARM), and time series forecasting - to uncover hidden patterns, predictive insights, and future projections. Results: A total of 131 ambulance collisions were analyzed. The majority of incidents involved emergency urban ambulances. MLR and DT achieved prediction accuracies of 41% and 35%, respectively. ARM revealed significant association between daytime incidents, normal road conditions, and the absence of patient involvement. Time series forecasting predicted a gradual increase followed by stabilization in collision incidents. Conclusion: This study highlights the crucial role of a dedicated collision review panel in managing and mitigating ambulance collision risks. ML techniques provided evidence-based support for decision-making. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts of targeted training programs and safety protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.