ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2025
Atopic dermatitis occurrence and progression and allergen immunotherapy: A real-world, retrospective cohort study in Germany.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in allergen immunotherapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the sole causal and preventive disease-modifying therapy currently available for allergic diseases. However, it must be acknowledged that controlled studies feature inherent results bias due to specific criteria and monitoring during the study. This real-world evidence (RWE) study was therefore designed to analyse data on large longitudinal prescriptions of different types of AIT in order to evaluate the therapeutic effect on the progression and onset of atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: The analysis was based on IQVIA™ LRx prescription data for statutorily insured patients in Germany. A total of 122,600 patients were included in the study, and we identified prescriptions of AIT for house dust mites (HDM), grasses (GR) and early flowering trees (EFT) from 2008 to 2017. We compared AIT groups to control groups, which were selected from patients not treated with AIT but with at least 2 prescriptions of symptomatic allergic rhinitis (AR) medication. We measured the impact of AIT treatment on AD using symptomatic AD medication. Results: The use of all 3 forms of AIT resulted in a significant decrease in the necessity for AD medication when compared to the control group. Moreover, in patients who did not present with AD at the outset of the study, AIT was observed to significantly reduce the likelihood of developing AD at a later stage, in comparison to allergic patients who were not subjected to AIT. Conclusion: Our results confirm the positive effects of AIT in patients with AD. The findings of this study illustrate the value of RWE studies as a means of further analysis of AIT as a disease modifier, thus providing a complementary perspective to that gained from clinical studies and enhancing the efficacy of AIT in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.