ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Empowering partnership: key lessons from the co-development of patient-oriented research with parents, researchers, and healthcare professionals.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to patient and public involvement in developing learning health systems within community health services: ascoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Co-developing research in partnership with patients and families is integral to Learning Health Systems (LHSs). These partnerships advance LHS objectives by (1) ensuring innovation is relevant to local contexts, (2) accelerating evidence into practice, and (3) improving services and outcomes that are meaningful to patients and families. Despite the importance of patient and family engagement in LHSs, strategies that guide researchers to build and sustain teams of patients, clinicians, and other partners are under-reported. Objective: We report actionable insights for co-developing research learned through our experience within Alberta's LHS. Context: Parents from a provincial advisory group in Alberta identified the need to evaluate parents' experiences with family-centered care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). In response, a research team of parent partners, researchers, and clinicians is co-developing a validated experience measure for parents in NICUs. Methods: During co-development, the research team engaged in reflective practice through semi-structured discussion informed by Schön's Reflection Model. Notes from the discussion were thematically analyzed to identify insights and research co-development strategies. Results: Three key insights and associated strategies were generated: (1) operationalizing co-development through a shared governance structure, terms of reference, and dedicated reflection; (2) adaptive approaches to team member involvement, renegotiating workflows, and addressing dissent; and (3) team evolution by nurturing reciprocity and utilizing existing partnerships to recruit members. Conclusion: We demonstrate how a team of patient partners, researchers, and clinicians can effectively co-develop research to address health system issues, and we present strategies to support patient-oriented research teams within LHSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.