ReviewCureus2025
Curated Collection for Educators: Five Key Papers About Impostor Phenomenon.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impostor phenomenon (IP) is characterized by persistent doubt in one's skills and accomplishments and a fear of being exposed as a fraud. It has been recognized as a significant challenge across various fields, including emergency medicine (EM), as IP has been linked to burnout, career stagnation, and adverse impacts on mental health. It is therefore vital that faculty development efforts target recognition of IP and mitigation of its negative effects on learners. However, given the vastly growing body of literature on IP, it may be difficult for educators to identify the most relevant resources to guide these efforts. Using a modified Delphi process, we curated a collection of literature to guide EM educators seeking to better understand and address IP. These included a qualitative study on physicians' self-assessment, a scoping review of IP literature, and studies examining structural contributors to and protective interventions against IP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.