ArticleCureus2025
Therapeutic Alternatives in a Pediatric Patient With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization: A Clinical Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A notable increase in the incidence of molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) has been observed in recent years. This trend may be attributed to a combination of factors, including increased public awareness, improved diagnostic techniques, and a greater emphasis on early childhood oral health. Clinically, MIH initially presents as white-to-brown opacities without enamel loss, progressing to post-eruptive breakdown in severe cases, often accompanied by hypersensitivity and atypical caries that may lead to pulp involvement. MIH treatment requires a correct clinical assessment of the tooth as the first step toward selecting a therapy that will ensure long-term success for the patient. The choice of dental materials is a decision that the clinician must make based on scientific evidence, the manufacturer's instructions, and the patient's general condition. The purpose of this case report was to present the clinical results of a 15-month follow-up of different therapy options in an 11-year-old male patient with MIH. The symptoms reported by the patient included hypersensitivity to hot and cold stimuli in the upper first permanent molars (FPMs) and tissue rupture in the lower FPM, which interfered with his eating function. The use of biomaterials, application of infiltrative resin (Icon®, DMG, Hamburg, Germany), preformed bands, topical applications of fluoride, as well as changes in oral hygiene habits and diet, were employed as therapeutics. The main contribution of this clinical case is that preserving the integrity of three molars with MIH in the same oral environment posed the greatest challenge to rehabilitation. However, with an individualized treatment plan, the evolution can be successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.