ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence of Locomotive Syndrome in Perioperative Patients With Localized Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Many patients with cancer experience reduced activities of daily living due to muscle weakness and fatigue caused by underlying symptoms and treatment side effects. However, the incidence of locomotive syndrome, which may reduce mobility due to motor dysfunction in patients with cancer, has not been sufficiently explored. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence of locomotive syndrome and identify its risk factors in perioperative patients with cancer. Methods We included 636 perioperative patients with localized cancer who were treated between 2020 and 2023. The severity of locomotive syndrome was classified into stages 1, 2, and 3. Results The overall locomotive syndrome rate was 88.1%, with distribution across stages: stage 1 (56.8%), stage 2 (17.5%), and stage 3 (13.8%). Among men, the overall incidence was 86.5%, with stage 1 (60.3%), stage 2 (15.5%), and stage 3 (10.7%). Among women, the overall incidence was 90.6%, with stage 1 (50.6%), stage 2 (20.9%), and stage 3 (19.1%). Half of patients in their 20s and two-thirds in their 30s had locomotive syndrome. The rates were 58.6%, 80.4%, 81.8%, 93.2%, and 97.8% in the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s age groups, respectively. Individuals in their 40s had significantly lower rates than those in older groups. Age, grip strength, and percent vital capacity were identified as risk factors. Conclusion A high prevalence of locomotive syndrome was observed among patients with localized cancer. Age, reduced grip strength, and lower respiratory capacity were identified as associated factors. While the findings suggest possible implications for postoperative recovery, further validation through longitudinal studies is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.