ReviewCureus2025
Evolving Paradigms in the Management of Trigeminal Nerve Injuries Post Oral Surgery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trigeminal nerve injuries are among the most challenging complications encountered in oral and maxillofacial surgery, often resulting in significant sensory and functional deficits. The present narrative review explores the evolving paradigms in the diagnosis and management of these injuries, focusing on conventional microsurgical techniques as well as recent advancements in regenerative therapies. Common causes include surgical trauma, chemical insults, and implant-related complications. Diagnostic modalities such as qualitative and quantitative neurosensory testing, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and magnetic resonance neurography are discussed. Management options range from early microsurgical intervention and nerve grafting to the use of nerve conduits, stem cells, growth factors, and electrical stimulation. Despite these advancements, anatomical complexity, timing of intervention, and individual biological variability pose significant limitations. Emerging technologies, including AI-based imaging, soft tissue-driven planning, and virtual surgical simulation, offer promising prospects for improving patient outcomes. The review emphasizes the need for timely, individualized, and multidisciplinary approaches to optimize functional recovery and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.