ArticleCureus2025
Proportion of Protrusion of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation 2 Over the Greater Trochanter in Pertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Pertrochanteric femur fractures comprise approximately half of all hip fractures. The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation 2 (PFNA2), designed by Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO), is an intramedullary device with a helical blade rather than a screw for better purchase in the femoral head. This modification in the proximal femur nail (PFN) was done to adapt to the Asian population and reduce nail-related complications in the Asian population. Materials and methods The study was conducted in a tertiary health center from November 2022 to November 2024 and included 40 subjects with pertrochanteric fractures operated on with PFNA2. Patients were followed up at six weeks and six months. Parker's ratio, nail protrusion height, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were calculated. Observations and results The majority of the patients in the study belonged to the age group of 60-75 years (37.5%). Nail protrusion height shows wide variability, ranging from 0.00 mm to 29.30 mm, with a mean of 6.01 mm and a considerable standard deviation (SD) of 10.39 mm. Parker's ratio, postoperatively, had a mean of 0.41 with SD of 0.88, ranging from 0.18 to 0.63. HHS was used to perform a clinical evaluation for these patients. The associated p-value for the correlation between Parker's ratio and HHS was 0.002 at six weeks, which is less than the significance level of 0.05, indicating that the correlation is statistically significant. The correlation between nail protrusion height and HHS was calculated by Pearson's correlation coefficient, which at six weeks was 𝑟=-0.210, indicating there was a negative correlation between nail protrusion height and HHS, so as the nail protrusion height increases, the HHS tends to decrease. Conclusion Pertrochanteric femur fracture is common in day-to-day life, with a bimodal age distribution. Our study concludes that PFNA2 is an excellent implant for the treatment of the pertrochanteric femur fracture. All the patients had an excellent follow-up score. A few patients, mainly female patients, had significant nail protrusion over the greater trochanter, with a higher Parker's ratio, and had mild lateral hip pain. The pain was not significant and did not affect the patient's day-to-day activities. This could be improved with the central placement of the helical blade. We do not recommend any changes in nail design; rather, we suggest proper helical blade placement to avoid nail protrusion. These variations due to sex and age should be studied further to establish any changes in implant design. Further studies with a bigger sample size and longer follow-up should be carried out for more definite results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.