Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861547›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Perceptions of Fungal Contamination in Hospital Humidifiers Among Healthcare Providers in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zaina B Rawashdeh, Mohammad A Al-Shalalfeh, Abdulrahman M Alsarhan, Leen O Sabbah, Khaled Kettaneh, Farah M Shahin, Basil G Daradkeh, Nour A Alaqqad, Subhi M Nassar, Nada M Abujbara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zaina B RawashdehFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Mohammad A Al-ShalalfehFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Abdulrahman M AlsarhanFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Leen O SabbahFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Khaled KettanehFaculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Irbid, JOR.
Farah M ShahinMedicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman, JOR.
Basil G DaradkehGeneral Practice, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JOR.
Nour A AlaqqadFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Subhi M NassarFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Nada M AbujbaraFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital-acquired infections remain a critical concern globally. Fungal contamination of reusable hospital humidifiers, especially in intensive care units (ICUs), represents an under-recognized threat. These devices, if improperly maintained, may become reservoirs for opportunistic pathogens such as Aspergillus and Fusarium, thereby compromising patient safety.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to explore the perceptions of fungal contamination in hospital humidifiers across Jordan and describe associated disinfection practices, protocol presence, and staff awareness, with the aim of informing targeted preventive strategies.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted from May 1 to June 1, 2025, using an anonymous, self-administered online questionnaire distributed via hospital email lists and official WhatsApp groups. Eligible participants included physicians, nurses, residents, medical students, and infection control staff from departments that regularly use humidifiers (e.g., ICUs, pediatrics, internal medicine, emergency medicine). The survey collected data on disinfection routines, protocol availability, and awareness of fungal risks. In total, 50 valid responses were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used, and Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Tests were applied to assess associations. However, the findings are limited by the reliance on self-reported data, the absence of microbiological validation, limited details on humidifier types and maintenance, potential departmental confounding, and the small convenience sample (n=50), which may affect generalizability. Ethical approval was not required under local guidelines, given the minimal-risk nature of the study.

resultsOf the 50 valid responses, self-reported data showed that 29 participants (58%) observed previous fungal contamination in their department's humidifiers. Contamination was reported in all humidifiers located in ICUs (n = 17, 100%) and general wards (n = 2, 100%). A statistically significant association was observed between cleaning frequency and contamination (p = 0.0034), with higher contamination among frequently cleaned devices. Geographic disparities were also noted, with Amman showing a 100% (n = 19) contamination rate, compared to 7.7% (n = 1) in Irbid (p < 0.001). While 44 (88%) participants were aware of fungal risks, only 27 (54%) reported having written cleaning protocols. Results are limited by reliance on unverified staff reports. Therefore, contamination rates were based on participant perception and may be influenced by department-specific practices or equipment use frequency.

conclusionFungal contamination in hospital humidifiers is widespread, particularly in ICUs. The paradoxical association between frequent cleaning and higher contamination may reflect increased usage and confounding by department type. These findings highlight the urgent need for standardized protocols, microbiological monitoring, and staff training to mitigate nosocomial fungal infections in Jordan.

Indexed as

cleaning protocolsfungal contaminationhospital-acquired infectionshumidifiersinfection controlintensive care units (icus)jordan

Identifiers

PMID40861547
PMCPMC12375258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.