Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861546›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Factors Influencing Medical Students' Specialty Choice: Insights to Address the Evolving Primary Care Gap.

Ana Angeli, Jonathan Ryan, Christian Palacios, Ghaith Al-Eyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana AngeliDepartment of Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University's Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Jonathan RyanDepartment of Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University's Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Christian PalaciosDepartment of Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University's Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Ghaith Al-EydDepartment of Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University's Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The current and projected nationwide shortage of primary care physicians necessitates studying factors that could influence students' specialty choice for their future medical practice. This study evaluates the influence of potential factors involved in students' decision-making process regarding specialty selection and proposes appropriate mitigations to enhance interest in primary care specialties. Methods Students completed an anonymous 43-question online survey distributed across three medical schools in Florida and California. The survey was sent to all medical students at these institutions, regardless of academic year. It included questions on demographics, specialty interests, perceived external prestige, financial goals, clinical experiences, and personal hobbies. Influential factors were measured using Likert scales. To identify students interested in primary care, we included those who ranked Family Medicine, Pediatrics, or Internal Medicine among their top three specialty choices. The survey was developed through an iterative process among the authors, with a focus on factors such as community perception, peer influence, financial incentives, and clinical exposure. Results One hundred students completed the survey, with only 26% (n=26) ranking surgery as their top choice, and 64% (n=64) of students including primary care in their top three choices. Students rated their top choice as having a better reputation in the healthcare field compared to primary care (p = 0.0028). Students also rated their top specialty choices as requiring a higher skill level compared to primary care (p = 0.0015). The median minimum level of income students would be satisfied with as an attending was $250-300k. Students who chose a minimum level of income below $300k were more likely to agree with the statement that a clinical experience made them choose their specialty (p = 0.016). Conclusion We found that students' specialty choices were influenced by income considerations, perceived biases against primary care within the healthcare community, and their own perceptions of their skill levels. Introducing early clinical exposure to primary care, such as incorporating primary care physicians as faculty and providing early hands-on experiences, may help improve perceptions of primary care specialties and foster greater student interest in these fields.

Indexed as

medical specialtyphysician shortageprestigeprimary care medicineprofessional identity formation

Identifiers

PMID40861546
PMCPMC12375372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.