ArticleCureus2025
Telemedicine: The New Vanguard in Gynecological Care.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a shift in healthcare delivery, with both patients and physicians seeking alternatives to minimize hospital visits. Telemedicine has emerged as a viable solution, offering comparable health outcomes to conventional in-person consultations while improving patient satisfaction. This study aims to present our experience in establishing a teleconsultation service for antenatal patients, evaluating its impact on maternal and fetal outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction. METHODOLOGY: A dedicated teleconsultation unit was initiated in April 2020 to manage antenatal care remotely. Patients received virtual consultations, with in-person appointments scheduled only when clinically necessary. Data were collected on teleconsultations, maternal and fetal outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, feedback from both patients and healthcare providers was recorded to assess the effectiveness of the service.
resultsOver one year, teleconsultation services were provided to 2,340 patients, including 1,550 antenatal cases and 790 with gynecological concerns. Among antenatal patients, 1,390 successfully completed teleconsultations, with 109 receiving teleconsultation services without prior appointments. Each antenatal patient, on average, had three virtual consultations and two in-person visits. A total of 76% of antenatal patients were scheduled for follow-up teleconsultations. Furthermore, 18% required in-person evaluations, 3% were directly advised of admission following teleconsultation, and 2% were referred for fetal medicine interventions, including chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, or advanced ultrasound assessments. The average duration of a teleconsultation was 5 minutes and 15 seconds, and 90% of patients reported satisfaction with the service.
conclusionTeleconsultation proved to be an effective strategy for reducing the need for physical visits while maintaining favorable maternal and fetal outcomes. High patient satisfaction rates further highlight its feasibility as a sustainable model for antenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.