ArticleCureus2025
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Root Canal Morphological Variations in Maxillary Second Premolars.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective A comprehensive understanding of root canal morphology and its anatomical variations is critical for the success of root canal treatment (RCT). Unrecognized variations may lead to incomplete cleaning, shaping, and obturation, potentially resulting in treatment failure. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and distribution of root canal configuration types in maxillary second premolars (Mx2P) and their association with gender using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed 384 CBCT scans of fully developed, untreated Mx2Ps in patients aged 18 to 65 years. Teeth with restorations, prior endodontic treatment, gross caries, fractures, ankylosis, or pulpal calcifications were excluded. Root canal morphology was classified according to Vertucci's classification system using the Carestream Dental Imaging Software 3D Module v2.4. Gender-based comparisons were conducted using the chi-square test. Results Scans from 219 patients (114 males (52.1%), 105 females (47.9%)) with a mean age of 42.35 ± 13.79 years were included. The most prevalent canal configuration was Vertucci's Type I (n = 240, 62.5%), followed by Type II (n = 96, 25.0%), Type IV (n = 30, 7.8%), Type VI (n = 3, 0.8%), Type VII (n =3, 0.8%), Type III (n = 7, 1.8%), Type V (n = 4, 1.0%), and Type VIII (n = 1, 0.3%). No statistically significant association was found between root canal morphology and gender (p = 0.915). Conclusion Vertucci's Type I was the most common root canal configuration in maxillary second premolars. The findings highlight the importance of thorough radiographic assessment using CBCT to identify anatomical variations for effective endodontic treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.