ArticleHealth care science2025
Multilingual Virtual Healthcare Assistant.
Article in Health care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a virtual healthcare assistant framework designed to provide support in multiple languages for efficient and accurate healthcare assistance. The system employs a transformer model to process sophisticated, multilingual user inputs and gain improved contextual understanding compared to conventional models, including long short-term memory (LSTM) models. In contrast to LSTMs, which sequence processes information and may experience challenges with long-range dependencies, transformers utilize self-attention to learn relationships among every aspect of the input in parallel. This enables them to execute more accurately in various languages and contexts, making them well-suited for applications such as translation, summarization, and conversational Comparative evaluations revealed the superiority of the transformer model (accuracy rate: 85%) compared with that of the LSTM model (accuracy rate: 65%). The experiments revealed several advantages of the transformer architecture over the LSTM model, such as more effective self-attention, the ability for models to work in parallel with each other, and contextual understanding for better multilingual compatibility. Additionally, our prediction model exhibited effectiveness for disease diagnosis, with accuracy of 85% or greater in identifying the relationship between symptoms and diseases among different demographics. The system provides translation support from English to other languages, with conversion to French (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy score: 0.7), followed by English to Hindi (0.6). The lowest Bilingual Evaluation Understudy score was found for English to Telugu (0.39). This virtual assistant can also perform symptom analysis and disease prediction, with output given in the preferred language of the user.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.