ArticleHealth care science2025
Validation and Reliability Testing of the Yonsei Lifestyle Profile for Assessing Multifaceted Health Lifestyles.
Article in Health care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to validate and test the reliability of the Yonsei lifestyle profile (YLP) in assessing multifaceted health lifestyle levels in a study population from the United States. Methods: The YLP-English version and health-promoting lifestyle profile II were administered to 100 individuals living in the United States. Concurrent validity was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and discriminant validity was examined by comparing sex and age differences through Results: The YLP-English Version demonstrated concurrent validity with the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II, showing consistent correlations for the total score (0.3, Conclusion: In this study, we validated the YLP-English version as a reliable instrument for assessing health-related lifestyle behaviors. The YLP uniquely captures both lifestyle frequency and satisfaction, offering a comprehensive perspective on health behaviors. Although this tool is currently most applicable in population-level studies, future research should establish clinical thresholds to enhance its utility in individualized health assessments and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.