ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Pilot Study: Prospective, First-in-human Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Tissue Apposition Device (ENIVO) Following Simple Unilateral Mastectomy.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgery resulting in tissue removal and the formation of dead space is traditionally managed with surgical drains. Drains are used to reduce fluid accumulation and decrease the risk of infection, dehiscence, and seroma formation. However, drains do not actively appose adjacent tissue planes to address dead space. A first-in-human clinical study was undertaken following simple unilateral mastectomy using a novel tissue apposition device. Methods: This prospective pilot study collected data on 10 participants undergoing simple unilateral mastectomy who would otherwise have received standard surgical drains as part of postoperative management. Participants were instead managed with a pulsed air closure technology (PACT) device designed to remove fluid and to appose adjacent tissue planes of the excisional site. Participants were monitored for complications, fluid output, and fluid accumulation, with a 3-month follow-up. Results: The mean tissue excised was 793.7 ± 353.9 g. The PACT device removed a mean cumulative fluid volume of 306.2 ± 163.7 mL during a mean treatment duration of 6.5 ± 1.5 days. Ultrasound assessment, at approximately 14 days postoperatively, estimated a median fluid accumulation of 6.9 mL (interquartile range: 0.0-66.2 mL) at the treatment site. Minor complications included exit site bruising, erythema before drainage catheter removal, and a single resolving superficial infection. Only 1 participant developed a seroma requiring clinical intervention. Conclusions: The PACT device performed its intended function in simple unilateral mastectomies. Minor complications were similar to those observed with traditional surgical drains and all resolved by the 3-month follow-up. These findings warrant further investigation in larger cohorts and in additional surgical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.