ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Diagnostic performance and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected central nervous system infections: a prospective comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infections. Methods: prospective study was conducted from December 2019 to January 2024, enrolling 110 patients with suspected CNS infections. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were subjected to mNGS, conventional biochemistry, and culture. Clinical features and outcomes were compared between patients confirmed with CNS infections and those without. Results: Of the enrolled patients, 69 were diagnosed with CNS infections. mNGS identified pathogens in 62 cases (77.11%), including 54 clinically confirmed true positives (49.09%), significantly surpassing traditional CSF culture (6.36%). mNGS reported results within 24 hours, considerably shorter than the 72~120 hours required for culture. Compared to the non-infection group, patients with CNS infections had significantly higher ICU admission(ICUA) rates, prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and elevated rates of antibiotic adjustment and mNGS positivity (P<0.05). CSF turbidity, cell count, and protein levels were significantly elevated, while glucose and chloride levels were reduced. Logistic regression identified mNGS, CSF protein, and glucose levels as independent predictors of CNS infection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy for continuous CSF variables over binary ones, with mNGS showing robust performance [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.794]. Conclusion: mNGS offers rapid and accurate pathogen detection, outperforming conventional methods in sensitivity and turnaround time, and provides valuable guidance for individualized antimicrobial treatment in CNS infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.