ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
An immunotherapy guide constructed by cGAS-STING signature for breast cancer and the biofunction validation of the pivotal gene HOXC13 via
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cGAS-STING pathway in pulmonary infectious and sterile inflammation: differences, connections, and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A 7-gene expression signature predicts immune microenvironment remodeling and neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy response in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The DDR-immune fitness score: a biomarker for guiding parp and immunotherapy synergy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: As the most common cancer in women, immunotherapy has become a pivotal element in the treatment of breast cancer, particularly for cases resistant to traditional therapies. The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is recognized as the primary DNA-sensing mechanism that initiates immune and inflammatory responses. In this study, we aim to explore the role of the cGAS-STING pathway in breast cancer immunotherapy resistance. Methods: Multiple machine learning algorithms were applied to construct an immunotherapy subgroup model and Results: Building upon extensively researched genes within the cGAS-STING pathway, we identified eight genes that serve as indicators of breast cancer's responsiveness to anti-PD1 therapy. Through consensus clustering, patients were categorized into high-response and low-response groups based on these eight genes. Subsequently, we extracted the pivotal gene set by WGCNA, which showed the highest correlation with the response to immune therapy, followed by the selection of 11 genes, which held significant associations with T-cell exhaustion, immune score, and patient survival. Employing machine learning, our novel classification model based on the 11-gene signature effectively differentiated between high-response and low-response groups in 16 out of 18 independent breast cancer cohorts from the GEO database. Notably, this 11-gene signature also predicted the sensitivity of breast cancer to both conventional and immune therapies, aligning closely with predictions from the OncoPredict algorithm. Further, Conclusion: Our study implies that HOXC13 is a potential therapy target for BRCA immunotherapy and 11-gene signature is a potential tool for clinical evaluation of anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.