Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861365›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

The effects of classroom acoustic quality on student perception and wellbeing: a systematic review across educational levels.

Alice Mercugliano, Arianna Corbani, Lucia Bigozzi, Giulia Vettori, Oriana Incognito

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alice MercuglianoDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Arianna CorbaniDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lucia BigozziDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia VettoriDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Oriana IncognitoDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acoustic quality of the school environment is crucial in enhancing learning and contributing to classroom wellbeing. The aim of this systematic review was 2-fold: (1) to investigate students' perspectives on listening in different learning contexts, with a focus on noise and reverberation in the classroom; and (2) to investigate the impact of indoor acoustic quality and reverberation on wellbeing. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) procedures to identify peer-reviewed studies, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using an existing framework. The results highlight an age-related progression in acoustic awareness from preschool children with limited differentiation to older students with refined perceptions. The impact of acoustics on wellbeing extends beyond learning to social relationships, motivation, and engagement, with older students exhibiting greater sensitivity than younger students. A research gap exists in preschool settings owing to methodological challenges in assessing young children's experiences. This review highlights the need for improved acoustic standards, tailored interventions, and awareness programmes to improve learning environments and wellbeing.

Indexed as

acoustic qualityreverberationschool environmentstudents' perceptionwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40861365
PMCPMC12375617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.