ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Validation of the Chinese version of Emotion Regulation Strategies for Artistic Creative Activities Scale (ERS-ACA-C) among Chinese college students majoring in art and design.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the ERS-ACA Scale Among Chinese College Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Types and influencing factors of psychological health among freshmen in Chinese art vocational colleges: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Translating the Emotion Regulation Strategies for Artistic Creative Activities Scale (ERS-ACA) into Chinese and adapting it for Chinese college students majoring in art and design. Methods: Translated ERS-ACA into Chinese using a cross-cultural adaptation approach, and validated its psychometric properties among Chinese college students majoring in art and design. Three hundred and thirty-eight Chinese college students majoring in art and design were collected to test the scale's reliability and validity, of which 150 students were retested 2 weeks later. Another 200 college students majoring in art and design were selected to perform Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: Item 1 of the Chinese version of ERS-ACA (ERS-ACA-C) was removed for its low correlation with the total score of ERS-ACA-C. We got the ERS-ACA-C with 17 items. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed that ERS-ACA-C has a general factor and three factors, consisting of 17 items. The explained variance of ERS-ACA-C was 61.098%. CFA validated that the three-factor model fit the data of ERS-ACA-C. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of ERS-ACA-C and its three factors was 0.883, 0.857, 0.875, and 0.854, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed between ERS-ACA-C and Self-Expression and Emotion Regulation in Art Making Scale (SERAMS) to calculate the criterion-related validity ( Conclusion: ERS-ACA-C has relatively good reliability and validity. It can be used to assess the Emotion Regulation Strategies for Artistic Creative Activities of Chinese college students majoring in art and design in their artistic creative activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.