ArticleAdvances in patient-reported outcomes2025
Comparing three measures of sleep disturbance in persons with chronic low back and neck pain.
Article in Advances in patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enduring versus curable: mixed-methods perspectives about pain among chiropractic patients.European journal of integrative medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the concordance among three sleep disturbance items from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Methods: We examined the effects of item wording in a sample of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic neck pain (CNP) who responded to three measures that included sleep disturbance items. We administered the items at baseline and 3-month follow-up in an observational study of patients in the United States (N=1,020). We estimated associations among the items using correlations and cross-tabulations. Results: Polychoric correlations among the sleep items ranged from 0.56 to 0.71. The ODI, NDI, and PROMIS-29 were strongly correlated at baseline and three months later. The cross-tabulations revealed that the ODI and NDI responses were compressed, with most responses indicating low levels of sleep disturbance. Answers to the PROMIS-29 item were more widely distributed across its response categories. Conclusion: When determining the value of each measure, researchers should weigh their different properties and tie the selected measures to their unique research objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.