ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Random forest-driven mortality prediction in critical IBD care: a dual-database model integrating comorbidity patterns and real-time physiometrics.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses significant mortality risks for critically ill patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, driven by complications such as malnutrition, thromboembolism, and multi-organ dysfunction. Current prognostic tools for mortality prediction in this population remain limited. Machine learning (ML) offers advantages in handling complex clinical data but has not been systematically applied to this high-risk cohort. This multicenter study aimed to develop and validate ML-based models for mortality risk stratification in critically ill IBD patients using large-scale ICU databases. Methods: Data from 551 IBD patients in the MIMIC-IV database (2008-2019) were analyzed, with external validation using the eICU dataset. Nine ML algorithms (XGBoost, logistic regression, LightGBM, random forest, decision tree, elastic net, MLP, KNN, RSVM) were trained to predict 1-year mortality. Predictors included demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and disease severity scores. Missing data (<30%) were imputed using random forest. The cohort was split into training (75%) and internal testing (25%) sets, with hyperparameter optimization via 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and calibration curves. The SHAP framework was integrated with predictive analytics to systematically evaluate key determinants of mortality risk through quantitative feature importance analysis. A nomogram was constructed based on key predictors identified through logistic regression. Results: The random forest model achieved superior discrimination in internal validation (AUC > 0.8). Nine predictors were identified: malignancy history, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Red Cell Distribution Width (Rdw), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (Sofa), age, heart rate, weight and gender. The nomogram demonstrated robust external validation performance in the eICU cohort (AUC > 0.8). Conclusion: We developed and validated a machine learning-based nomogram to predict mortality in critically ill IBD patients, integrating interpretable predictors from multicenter ICU data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.