ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Psychosocial factors at work in industries in the countryside of São Paulo.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The literature highlights psychosocial factors at work as major causes of increased occupational stress. These factors are also associated with musculoskeletal disorders and mental and behavioral issues among workers. Objectives: To describe and analyze the relationships between management characteristics and psychosocial factors at work, as perceived by industrial workers, and their impact on increased work-related stress. Methods: This is a case study with a qualitative approach, using in-depth interviews and participant observation during fieldwork. Results: The 5 companies studied predominantly employed a Taylorist production model. Rigid hierarchical management was observed, as well as encouragement of competitiveness among workers, poorly trained leadership, and insufficient investment in training and Occupational Health and Safety. Additionally, there was a disregard for psychosocial factors that can trigger stress and illness. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that, irrespective of the specific industrial activity, the primary psychosocial factors at work were overwork, lack of autonomy and control over tasks, lack of social support, lack of career planning and recognition, poor communication, and psychological abuse, including moral harassment. The findings suggest that organizational management should focus on actions to prevent psychosocial factors at work in order to promote workers' well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.