Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861167›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.

Willard C Harrill, Frank G Opelka, Mary L Witkowski, David E Melon, Jacob S Riegler, Sally Engelman, Charles R Woodard, Scott M Goldstein, David C Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Willard C HarrillCarolina Ear Nose Throat-Sinus and Allergy Center. PA Hickory North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-1343
Frank G OpelkaThe PACES Center for Value in Healthcare, Inc Framingham Massachusetts USA.
Mary L WitkowskiDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
David E MelonCarolina Ear Nose Throat-Sinus and Allergy Center. PA Hickory North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1375-2143
Jacob S RieglerHarvard Business School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6316-3294
Sally EngelmanBridgepointMD Inc Saint Charles Missouri USA.
Charles R WoodardSurgery/Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA.
Scott M GoldsteinTri-Century Eye Care Southampton Pennsylvania USA.
David C JohnsonDepartment of Urology UNC School fo Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art review from the perspective of the surgeon and the surgical specialty academies of the conceptual shift from a volume-driven fee-for-service payment model to one of value-based accountable care payment. This field guide attempts to clarify drivers of surgical value-based performance and outline a comprehensive strategy to successfully engage this healthcare reform paradigm. Data Source: Pubmed/MEDLINE/Google search. Review Methods: Pubmed/MEDLINE/Google search was performed during June 1, 2024-May 17, 2025 for value-based initiatives, administrative, and government agency publications, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation value-based care policy, directives, and programs. Conclusions: The transition from volume-based to value-based payment models necessitates rethinking how surgeons define, quantify, and engage the care they deliver. The social contract between the surgeon and patient is poorly aligned within the current fragmented fee-for-service payment model. Relative value units continue to function as a poor benchmark measure of the physician-patient relationship, which is foundational to achieving consistent patient engagement and favorable clinical outcomes. To facilitate this value-based realignment within surgical care, we introduce a novel three-dimensional framework for patient experience management (EM

Indexed as

accountable carecare‐coordinationEM3episode‐of‐carepatient experience managementpatient journey mappingsynoptic reporting standardstotal cost‐of‐carevalue‐based carevalue‐based referrals

Identifiers

PMID40861167
PMCPMC12375969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.