ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Social Media Perspectives on Over-The-Counter Hearing Aids: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Twitter (X) Data.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social Media Perspectives on Over-The-Counter Hearing Aids: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Twitter (X) Data.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess public perspective on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids through social media data. Methods: Twitter (X)'s Application Program Interface was utilized to collect English-language tweets mentioning OTC hearing aids between January 2019 and October 2022. Sentiment analysis was conducted using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner, categorizing tweets as positive, neutral, or negative. Main outcomes and measures were average compound sentiment scores. Joinpoint analysis was used to evaluate changes in sentiment scores over time. Two independent raters categorized account type and tweets into categories determined by thematic analysis. Results: A total of 8912 tweets were included. The tweets were categorized as Economy, Political, Logistics, Information, and Other based on thematic analysis. Overall mean (SD) compound sentiment score (range: -1 to +1) was weakly positive at 0.15 (0.40). The total number of tweets increased significantly after August 2022, with 331 tweets in Q2 of 2022 and 2110 tweets in Q3 of 2022. There were no significant changes in sentiment scores over the study period. Economy received the highest average compound sentiment score of 0.21 (0.39), followed by Political 0.18 (0.46), Logistics 0.16 (0.41), Other 0.14 (0.39), and lastly Information 0.13 (0.36). Conclusion: This study demonstrated an increase in public awareness regarding OTC hearing aids in social media; although the sentiment toward them remained unchanged, reflecting mixed opinions on their benefits and challenges. Our findings highlight the need for more transparent and educational information, particularly given the increasing confusion accompanying the growing awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.