Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861134›Full record

ArticleIndustrial psychiatry journal

Neuropsychological and psychopathological correlates of insight in persons with OCD.

Saima Ahmed, Rajesh Kumar, Niska Sinha, Priya Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saima AhmedDepartment of Psychiatry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Rajesh KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Niska SinhaDepartment of Psychiatry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Priya KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic psychiatric disorder characterized by persistent, distressing obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors. In OCD, the level of insight is classified as good, poor, or absent. Poorer insight is associated with a more complex clinical presentation and a poorer prognosis. Aim: The aim of our research was to investigate the relationship between the level of insight in individuals with OCD and various neuropsychological and psychopathological factors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited a total of 100 participants diagnosed with OCD. The Brown assessment of beliefs scale (BABS) was used to evaluate the insight of the patients. Psychopathology was assessed using the Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (YBOCS) and Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS). Neuropsychological assessments included the Stroop test, digit span test, controlled oral word association (COWA) test, trail making test, and Wisconsin card sorting test. Results: The majority of the patients had good insight (54%), mild depression (48%), and moderate symptom severity (47%). Patients with poor insight had significantly higher scores on the YBOCS and HAM-D. They also performed significantly worse on the WCST and TMT-A. Patients with comorbid depression (mild/moderate) showed significantly poor performance on the WCST compared to those without depression. Conclusion: The findings of our study indicate that patients with poor insight exhibit more severe forms of OCD, display greater psychopathology, and show more pronounced neuropsychological dysfunction.

Indexed as

InsightneuropsychologicalOCDpsychopathological

Identifiers

PMID40861134
PMCPMC12373340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.