Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861099›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

Radiomics-based prediction of HCC response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab.

Isaac Rodriguez, Abhinay Vellala, Timo Itzel, Jimmy Daza, Michael Vácha, De-Hua Chang, Manuel Debic, Michael T Dill, Max Seidensticker, Julia Mayerle and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Isaac RodriguezDivision of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Abhinay VellalaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Timo ItzelDivision of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Jimmy DazaDivision of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Michael VáchaDivision of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
De-Hua ChangDepartment of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Manuel DebicDepartment of Radiology, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael T DillDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Intoxications, Heidelberg University Hospital, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, D-80336 Munich, Germany.
Julia MayerleDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, D-80336 Munich, Germany.
Stefan MunkerDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, D-80336 Munich, Germany.
Stefan O SchoenbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Lukas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz University, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Peter R GalleUniversity Medical Center I, Department of Medicine, Mainz University, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Arndt WeinmannUniversity Medical Center I, Department of Medicine, Mainz University, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Dietmar TamandlDepartment of Radiology, Medical Faculty Vienna, Vienna University, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PinterDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard ScheinerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christel WeissDepartment of Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Maciej PechDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Magdeburg University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Friedrich SinnerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty Magdeburg, Magdeburg University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Verena KeitelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty Magdeburg, Magdeburg University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Marino VeneritoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty Magdeburg, Magdeburg University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Matthias Philip EbertDepartment of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas TeufelDivision of Hepatology, Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Matthias F FroelichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment has evolved with the introduction of atezolizumab/bevacizumab, showing improved outcomes over sorafenib. However, the response varies among patients, particularly between viral and non-viral etiologies. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate multimodal prediction models combining quantitative imaging and clinical markers to predict the treatment response in patients with HCC. Between March 2020 and May 2023, patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab were retrospectively identified from six centers in Germany and Austria. Patients underwent baseline contrast-enhanced liver MRI and follow-up imaging to assess the therapy response. Machine learning models, including RandomForestClassifier, were developed for radiomics, clinical and combined datasets. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using RandomizedSearchCV, followed by cross-validation to evaluate model performance. The study included 103 patients, with 70 achieving disease control (DC) and 33 experiencing disease progression (PD). Key findings included significant differences in treatment response and progression-free survival between the DC and PD groups. The radiomics model, using 14 selected features, achieved 73.1% accuracy and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.635 for the test set. The clinical model, with 4 selected features, achieved 73% accuracy and a ROC AUC of 0.649 for the test set. The combined model showed improved performance, with 69% accuracy and a ROC AUC of 0.753 for the test set. Hyperparameter tuning further enhanced the accuracy of the combined model to 80.1% and the ROC AUC to 0.771 for the test set. In conclusion, the hybrid model combining clinical and radiological data outperformed individual models, providing improved predictions of response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab in patients with HCC.

Indexed as

checkpoint inhibitorshepatocellular carcinomamachine learningprediction modelsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40861099
PMCPMC12373426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.