ArticleOncology letters2025
Radiomics-based prediction of HCC response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment has evolved with the introduction of atezolizumab/bevacizumab, showing improved outcomes over sorafenib. However, the response varies among patients, particularly between viral and non-viral etiologies. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate multimodal prediction models combining quantitative imaging and clinical markers to predict the treatment response in patients with HCC. Between March 2020 and May 2023, patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab were retrospectively identified from six centers in Germany and Austria. Patients underwent baseline contrast-enhanced liver MRI and follow-up imaging to assess the therapy response. Machine learning models, including RandomForestClassifier, were developed for radiomics, clinical and combined datasets. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using RandomizedSearchCV, followed by cross-validation to evaluate model performance. The study included 103 patients, with 70 achieving disease control (DC) and 33 experiencing disease progression (PD). Key findings included significant differences in treatment response and progression-free survival between the DC and PD groups. The radiomics model, using 14 selected features, achieved 73.1% accuracy and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.635 for the test set. The clinical model, with 4 selected features, achieved 73% accuracy and a ROC AUC of 0.649 for the test set. The combined model showed improved performance, with 69% accuracy and a ROC AUC of 0.753 for the test set. Hyperparameter tuning further enhanced the accuracy of the combined model to 80.1% and the ROC AUC to 0.771 for the test set. In conclusion, the hybrid model combining clinical and radiological data outperformed individual models, providing improved predictions of response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab in patients with HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.