ArticleJournal of family & reproductive health2025
Four Years' Experience at a Single Referral Center Regarding Urodynamic Findings in Women With Voiding Dysfunction.
Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the urodynamic findings in women with voiding dysfunction symptoms at a referral academic center. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent urodynamics to evaluate voiding dysfunction symptoms between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the electronic data registration system of the urogynecology clinic. Urodynamic findings, such as post-void residual (PVR), maximum urine flow (Q max), detrusor pressure (P det), abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP), and detrusor overactivity, as well as their association with each symptom of voiding dysfunction, were analyzed and reported. Results: A total of 591 women were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 54.09±12.3 years. The majority had experienced vaginal deliveries (82.9%). The most frequently reported symptom was incomplete voiding (71.1%), followed by post-void dribbling, intermittent stream and others. Post-void residual (PVR) >150 cc was identified in 2.7% of patients and was significantly associated with hesitancy and straining to void. It was also associated with increasing age and anterior and apical compartment prolapse. Conclusion: Voiding dysfunction symptoms do not reliably predict urodynamic findings. The low prevalence of post-void residual (PVR) in symptomatic patients and the lack of correlation between PVR and similar symptoms suggest that symptoms alone may not provide adequate evidence to indicate high PVR. Therefore, urodynamics may be necessary for evaluating patients with voiding dysfunction symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.