ArticleJournal of family & reproductive health2025
Comparing the Effectiveness of Expressive Writing and Relaxation on Mental Health and Treatment Success in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Infertility and its treatments can lead to mood disorders such as depression, anxiety, stress. This study aimed to compare the effects of relaxation and expressive writing on depression, anxiety, stress, and treatment success in women utilizing assisted reproductive technology methods. Materials and methods: In this parallel randomized clinical controlled trial, 90 infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology were involved. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: writing (n=30), relaxation (n=30), and control (n=30). The writing and relaxation groups received either expressive writing or relaxation interventions, while the control group only received routine treatment. The primary outcomes measured in the study were depression, anxiety, and stress, with treatment success as the secondary outcome. All participants completed the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale at the beginning of the treatment cycle and again before ovarian puncture. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon tests. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The results showed that mean differences in depression (P=0.001) and stress scores (P=0.011) before and after intervention in the writing group were significantly higher than in the control group. Additionally, only the writing group experienced a significant decrease in depression (P=0.016). However, there was no significant difference in other measured outcomes among the three groups. Conclusion: It is recommended to conduct more well-designed studies to further investigate the effects of expressive writing and relaxation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.