ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2025
Human Stress Classification Using Cardiovascular and Respiratory Data Based on Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stress, a widespread mental health concern, significantly impacts people well-being and performance. This study proposes a novel approach to stress detection by fusing cardiovascular and respiratory data. Methods: Fifteen participants underwent a mental stress induction task while their electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration signals were recorded. A real-time peak detection algorithm was developed for ECG signal processing, and both time and frequency domain features were extracted from ECG and respiration signals. Various machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, bagged decision trees, and random forests, were employed for classification, with accurate labeling achieved through the NASA-TLX questionnaire. Results: The results demonstrate that combining respiration and cardiovascular features significantly enhances stress classification performance compared to using each modality alone, achieving an accuracy of 95.6% ±1.7%. Forward feature selection identifies key discriminative features from both modalities. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the efficacy of multimodal physiological data integration for accurate stress detection, outperforming single-modality approaches and comparable studies in the literature. The findings highlight the potential of real-time monitoring systems in enhancing stress and health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.