ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Patient Preferences and Functional Outcomes of Forearm Crutches vs Hands-Free Single Crutches After Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assistive devices facilitate daily activities and recovery, and are essential for nonweightbearing ambulation after orthopaedic foot or ankle surgery.This study aimed to compare the usability of forearm crutches (FCs) and hands-free single crutches (HFSCs) during the early postoperative recovery phase in terms of their effects on mobility, speed, safety, range, endurance, personal preference, and quality of life. Methods: This prospective randomized crossover study included 35 participants. Assessments included the 36-Item Short-Form Survey, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire, and European Foot and Ankle Society Score administered preoperatively and at 2 follow-up examinations. Patients were assigned to either device (FC or HFSC) for the first 3 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was number of stumble events (SEs) during standardized mobility tests. For secondary outcomes (including mobility, speed, and range), patients completed clinical tests such as the 6-minute walk test, stair-climbing test, 10-m walk test, and indoor and outdoor parkour activities. Following the clinical tests, the patients provided qualitative feedback, including personal preference and overall device usage. After switching the devices, the tests were repeated at 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: Although FCs performed better in most mobility tests, patients favored HFSCs because of enhanced comfort and lower perceived exertion. Despite the physical advantages of FCs, patients tended to prefer HFSCs owing to their ergonomic benefits. The quality of life and physical function scores for both devices declined after surgery, reflecting a typical postoperative recovery phase. Younger and male patients generally performed better with HFSCs, whereas female, older, and overweight patients faced more challenges. Conclusion: FCs outperform HFSCs with respect to mobility, but patients prefer HFSCs due to comfort and reduced exertion although the clinical significance of these perceived differences remains uncertain. This underscores the need for personalized device recommendations to improve postoperative outcomes. This study highlights the complexity of device selection based on individual patient needs and preferences. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective, randomized comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.