Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Sonographic machine-assisted recognition and tracking of B-lines in dogs: the SMARTDOG study.

Aurélie Jourdan, Caroline Dania, Maxime Cambournac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aurélie JourdanCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Paris, France.
Caroline DaniaCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Paris, France.
Maxime CambournacCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) is a serious complication of heart failure in dogs, commonly characterized by excess fluid within the lung interstitium and alveoli. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) allows for the prompt identification of pulmonary alterations through the presence of B-lines. However, interpretation remains subjective and operator dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI) may offer standardized, real-time analysis, but its application in veterinary medicine is largely unexplored. Objective: To assess the performance of an AI-based ultrasound algorithm in detecting B-lines in dogs and to evaluate its agreement with manual quantification by experienced operators. Methods: In this prospective study conducted at a single center, 40 dogs were enrolled: 20 with suspected CPE and 20 healthy controls. CPE suspicion was based on respiratory distress, a left atrium-to-aorta ratio (La:Ao) ≥1.6, >3 B-lines per field at thoracic POCUS, and clinical improvement following furosemide administration. Lung ultrasound was performed according to the Vet BLUE protocol. Cine loops were analyzed using the Butterfly Auto B-line Counter and reviewed independently by two POCUS-trained clinicians, each blinded to the AI results and to the other's evaluation. Results: The AI algorithm failed to provide a B-line count in 14.2% of cineloops overall, with failures occurring in 11.8% of the suspected CPE group and 2.4% of the non-CPE group. Quantification failures were significantly more frequent in the suspected CPE group (OR 4.88; Conclusion: The AI algorithm demonstrated excellent agreement with experienced operators both for precise B-line counting and for the classification of pathological lung patterns. These findings support the potential of AI as a valuable decision-support tool for detecting clinically relevant cardiogenic pulmonary edema in veterinary critical care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceB-lines detectioncanine pulmonary edemalung ultrasoundpoint of care ultrasound (POCUS)

Identifiers

PMID40860925
PMCPMC12371216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.