ReviewJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2025
A review to determine regulatorily and reimbursement successes of studies conducted using data from Canadian patient support programs based on the real-world evidence guidelines published by Canadian drug agency and health Canada.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient Support Programs (PSPs) are growing globally to support early reimbursement, disease and medication dosing management. In Canada, the lack of public health support has promoted the rapid expansion of company-supported disease-specific or drug-product-specific PSPs. Data collected from these programs generate unique Canadian data serving as a valuable source of real-world data (RWD), generally adopted in EU and US as a source of evidence generation. This review evaluates the suitability of PSP data for regulatory or reimbursement submissions, based on recently published Real World Evidence guidelines by the Canadian Drug Agency (CDA-AMC). Methods: Peer-reviewed publications evaluating patients with chronic diseases enrolled in a PSP from 1 January 2020, to 31 March 2025, were selected for review. The checklist in the CDA-AMC RWE Guideline was used to measure the quality and suitability of the PSP data. Results: Nine studies were reviewed against the checklist. Based on the criteria required to inform decision-making, most studies failed to meet key criteria for regulatory submissions. One recently published study, "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab" met most regulatory and reimbursement submission requirements. Conclusion: Data quality validation, data source transparency, validated methodology to manage study bias, measured or unmeasured confounders, and robust outcome analysis, including sensitivity and quantitative bias analysis, are essential to ensure PSP data analysis results in successful decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.