ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
The effects of color and neutral density filters on dynamic accommodation in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual symptom burden after traumatic brain injury: a case-control evaluation of the Arabic BIVSS.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Visual symptoms related to accommodation are frequently reported after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), yet the effect of spectral and luminance-altering filters on dynamic accommodative performance remains unclear. This study objectively measured dynamic accommodation in individuals with mTBI and healthy controls under various filter conditions to determine if visual performance could be improved. Methods: Thirty participants with a medically diagnosed history of mTBI (age range 18-33 years) and 54 healthy controls (age range 21-30 years) completed monocular dynamic accommodation testing under three randomized viewing conditions: baseline with no filter (NF), a subjectively selected color filter (CF), and a luminance-matched neutral density filter (ND). Accommodation and disaccommodation responses to 5.00 D step stimuli were continuously recorded at 50 Hz using the PowerRef 3 photorefractor. First-order response parameters were extracted, such as peak velocity, response amplitude, latency, and response time. A mixed linear model was used to assess group, filter, and interaction effects. Results: At baseline (NF), the mTBI group showed significantly reduced accommodation peak velocity (mean difference = -1.68 D/sec) and response amplitude (mean difference = 0.55 D) compared to controls ( Discussion: Under baseline circumstances, especially in speed and magnitude of response, participants with mTBI showed apparent deficits in dynamic accommodation. These findings indicate that, rather than spectral filtering, brightness modulation via ND filters can significantly enhance accommodative performance in individuals with mTBI. This suggests ND filters may serve as a viable clinical intervention for improving accommodative dynamics in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.