ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
A placebo-controlled study of the doses and efficacy of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Ethanol-Insoluble Low-Molecular-Weight Fraction LEP-4 Derived FromAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of Methods: After curative resection, we used a 1:1:1 ratio to randomly assign patients with CRC with persistent OIPN (defined by a visual analogue scale [VAS] numbness score ≥40 mm) to the low-dose (L.E.M. 300 mg twice daily [bid]), high-dose (L.E.M. 900 mg bid), and placebo groups. The primary endpoint of this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial was the reduction in the VAS numbness score in the low-dose group compared with that in the placebo group at 12 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were evaluated. Results: Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to the placebo (n = 15), low-dose (n = 15), and high-dose (n = 15) groups. At 12 weeks, no significant difference in the reduction of the VAS numbness score was observed when the low-dose and placebo groups were compared (-12.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}; -34.54 to 10.14] Discussion: High-dose L.E.M. extract resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in VAS numbness scores without severe toxicity. Clinical Trial Registration: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs051210085, identifier jRCTs051210085.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.