ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Combined clinical and MRI-based radiomics model for predicting acute hematologic toxicity in gynecologic cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in precision radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- AI-driven radiogenomics in gynecologic oncology: from radiological digital biopsy to a new paradigm in precision therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute hematologic toxicity (HT) remains a critical dose-limiting complication in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy, particularly when combined with chemotherapy. Early prediction of severe HT could inform personalized management and minimize toxicity. We developed and validated a predictive model integrating clinical parameters and radiomic features, evaluating five machine learning approaches. Clinical data, dosimetric parameters, and pelvic bone marrow radiomic features extracted from MRI and CT images were analyzed. Feature selection was performed using LASSO and random forest algorithms, followed by comparison across multiple classification models. In the independent test set, the combined clinical and MRI-radiomics model showed superior predictive performance (AUC=0.927, accuracy=85.5%, sensitivity=92.3%, specificity=66.7%) compared to clinical-only (AUC=0.703), MRI-only (AUC=0.925, but low specificity of 38.1%), and CT-only models (AUC=0.54). The model performed notably better in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Key predictors included baseline hemoglobin, white blood cell count, bone marrow dosimetry, and MRI-derived texture and fat fraction features. Integrating clinical data with MRI-based radiomics provides a robust approach for predicting acute HT, potentially guiding personalized management strategies and improving safety during gynecologic cancer radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.