ArticleMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2025
Primary Idiopathic Chylopericardium in an Adult Female.
Article in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chylopericardium (CP), defined as the accumulation of chyle in the pericardial cavity, is a rare condition, especially in the absence of an identifiable secondary cause. Primary idiopathic chylopericardium (PIC) is even more uncommon, with limited cases reported in the literature. We report the case of a 43-year-old South Asian woman who presented with palpitations and fatigue. Echocardiography revealed a large pericardial effusion with signs of cardiac tamponade, necessitating emergent pericardiocentesis. The pericardial fluid aspirated was pinkish and turbid, which turned to milky white after centrifugation. Analysis of the pericardial fluid demonstrated a high triglyceride concentration, lymphocytic predominance, and fat globules, consistent with chylous effusion. A thorough diagnostic workup-including infectious, rheumatologic, and oncologic evaluations-was unrevealing, confirming a diagnosis of PIC. Lymphoscintigraphy was misleading in this case, with no thoracic duct abnormalities reported. Following an initial response to conservative management with pericardiocentesis and a medium-chain triglyceride-rich diet, the patient experienced recurrence of symptoms and fluid reaccumulation. Definitive management via thoracic duct ligation and pericardial window surgery was performed, resulting in complete resolution of the effusion. At 6-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence. This case highlights the importance of considering primary CP in the differential diagnosis of pericardial effusion. Absence of classical inflammatory signs and symptoms can be suggestive of chylous effusion. The report also supports surgical intervention as a definitive treatment even if lymphoscintigraphy does not reveal clear thoracic duct pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.