Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860766›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2025

Duets convey information about pair and individual identities in a Neotropical bird.

Pedro Diniz, Edvaldo F Silva-Jr, Gianlucca S Rech, Pedro H L Ribeiro, André C Guaraldo, Regina H Macedo, Paulo S Amorim

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro DinizInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-6376
Edvaldo F Silva-JrDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-738X
Gianlucca S RechDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil.
Pedro H L RibeiroDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7922-7042
André C GuaraldoInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação da Natureza, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG 36036-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-2926
Regina H MacedoDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-9172
Paulo S AmorimInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação da Natureza, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG 36036-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4979-8589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal individuality is essential for social discrimination but has been poorly studied in animals that produce communal signals (duets or choruses). Song overlapping and temporal coordination make the assessment of individuality in communal signals more complex. In addition, selection may favor the accurate identification of pairs over individuals by receivers in year-round territorial species with duetting and long-term pair bonding. Here, we studied pair and individual vocal signatures in the polyphonal duets of rufous horneros

Indexed as

coordinationduettingsocial discriminationsuboscinevocal individualityvocal signature

Identifiers

PMID40860766
PMCPMC12376049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.