Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860755›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2025

Climatic variation and risk assessment in a highly seasonal mammal.

McKenna Sanchez, Julien G A Martin, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

McKenna SanchezRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Box 519, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA.
Julien G A MartinRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Box 519, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7726-6809
Daniel T BlumsteinRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Box 519, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5793-9244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and its resulting effects on seasonality are known to alter a variety of animal behaviors including those related to foraging, phenology, and migration. Although many studies focus on the impacts of phenological changes on physiology or fitness enhancing behaviors, fewer have investigated the relationship between variation in weather and phenology on risk assessment. Fleeing from predators is an economic decision that incurs costs and benefits. As environmental conditions change, animals may face additional stressors that affect their decision to flee and influence their ability to effectively assess risk. Flight initiation distance (FID)-the distance at which animals move away from threats-is often used to study risk assessment. FID varies due to both internal and external biotic and physical factors as well as anthropogenic activities. We asked whether variation in weather and phenology is associated with risk-taking in a population of yellow-bellied marmots (

Indexed as

climate changeflight initiation distancephenologytemperatureyellow-bellied marmots

Identifiers

PMID40860755
PMCPMC12376033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.