Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860721›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Artificial liver classifier: a new alternative to conventional machine learning models.

Mahmood A Jumaah, Yossra H Ali, Tarik A Rashid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmood A JumaahDepartment of Computer Science, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
Yossra H AliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
Tarik A RashidDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Centre (AIIC), University of Kurdistan Hewlêr, Erbil, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Supervised machine learning classifiers sometimes face challenges related to the performance, accuracy, or overfitting. Methods: This paper introduces the Artificial Liver Classifier (ALC), a novel supervised learning model inspired by the human liver's detoxification function. The ALC is characterized by its simplicity, speed, capability to reduce overfitting, and effectiveness in addressing multi-class classification problems through straightforward mathematical operations. To optimize the ALC's parameters, an improved FOX optimization algorithm (IFOX) is employed during training. Results: We evaluate the proposed ALC on five benchmark datasets: Iris Flower, Breast Cancer Wisconsin, Wine, Voice Gender, and MNIST. The results demonstrate competitive performance, with ALC achieving up to 100% accuracy on the Iris dataset-surpassing logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, and support vector machine-and 99.12% accuracy on the Breast Cancer dataset, outperforming XGBoost and logistic regression. Across all datasets, ALC consistently shows smaller generalization gaps and lower loss values compared to conventional classifiers. Discussion: These findings highlight the potential of biologically inspired models to develop efficient machine learning classifiers and open new avenues for innovation in the field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceartificial liver classifier (ALC)classificationintelligent systemsmachine learningoptimization

Identifiers

PMID40860721
PMCPMC12371931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.