Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860696›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Reducing applied force in colonoscopy using a novel soft robotic colonoscope: Head-to-head study.

Jabed Foyez Ahmed, Korn Borvorntanajanya, Jialei Shi, Enrico Franco, Ara Darzi, Ferdinando Rodriguez Baena, Nisha Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jabed Foyez AhmedThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8889-7726
Korn BorvorntanajanyaThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2173-1895
Jialei ShiThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Enrico FrancoThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ara DarziThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ferdinando Rodriguez BaenaThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Nisha PatelGastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Current colonoscopies have a recognized limitation. Manual pushing and pulling required by operators provides gross movement in the bowel. Reported pain, therefore, is likely due to the manual force applied. Implementing novel steering techniques with a soft growing robotic system can potentially overcome challenges such as fine control, precise steering, and capability to expand treatment options for complex therapies. This study assessed a novel controlled-growing soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope in terms of force exhibited on a model bowel wall and its clinical implications. Methods: A head-to-head study using a hybrid colon phantom of the left colon was undertaken. Both the novel soft-robot and standard colonoscope were passed through the phantom by endoscopists. Multiple passes were undertaken in the phantom with both colonoscopy methods with force values recorded at two points (rectum and sigmoid) with pressure sensors. Results: Nine clinical endoscopists (4M:5F, 5 non-expert, 4 expert) were recruited. Average force with the novel robot was 0.25N (rectum) and 0.19N (sigmoid). Average force applied with standard colonoscopy was 2.82N (rectum) and 1.45N (sigmoid). Conclusions: This study demonstrated an improvement in force with the novel soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope. This suggests the possibility of more comfortable colonoscopy for patients. Currently time taken is longer with the novel robot, which is attributable to the learning curve and improves in subsequent passes. Further work will be undertaken in a complete colon model with aspirations to reach in-vivo experiments.

Indexed as

Endoscopy Lower GI TractPerformance and complicationsQuality and logistical aspectsQuality managementTraining

Identifiers

PMID40860696
PMCPMC12372447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.