ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Reducing applied force in colonoscopy using a novel soft robotic colonoscope: Head-to-head study.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Current colonoscopies have a recognized limitation. Manual pushing and pulling required by operators provides gross movement in the bowel. Reported pain, therefore, is likely due to the manual force applied. Implementing novel steering techniques with a soft growing robotic system can potentially overcome challenges such as fine control, precise steering, and capability to expand treatment options for complex therapies. This study assessed a novel controlled-growing soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope in terms of force exhibited on a model bowel wall and its clinical implications. Methods: A head-to-head study using a hybrid colon phantom of the left colon was undertaken. Both the novel soft-robot and standard colonoscope were passed through the phantom by endoscopists. Multiple passes were undertaken in the phantom with both colonoscopy methods with force values recorded at two points (rectum and sigmoid) with pressure sensors. Results: Nine clinical endoscopists (4M:5F, 5 non-expert, 4 expert) were recruited. Average force with the novel robot was 0.25N (rectum) and 0.19N (sigmoid). Average force applied with standard colonoscopy was 2.82N (rectum) and 1.45N (sigmoid). Conclusions: This study demonstrated an improvement in force with the novel soft robot compared with a standard colonoscope. This suggests the possibility of more comfortable colonoscopy for patients. Currently time taken is longer with the novel robot, which is attributable to the learning curve and improves in subsequent passes. Further work will be undertaken in a complete colon model with aspirations to reach in-vivo experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.