Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860693›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Shao-Bin Luo, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Yi-Qun Zhang, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shao-Bin LuoEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zu-Qiang LiuEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Li WangEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yi-Qun ZhangEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ming-Yan CaiEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Quan-Lin LiEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ping-Hong ZhouEndoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still considered a great challenge with a high risk of complications. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal GIST. Patients and methods: Between June 2013 and August 2024, we performed a retrospective study of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and follow-up were collected. Results: A total of 73 patients with duodenal GISTs were enrolled, including 31 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 42 who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Mean lesion size was 1.2 ± 0.5 cm and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. En bloc resection rates were 96.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Rates of R0 resection were 45.2% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of R1 resection were 54.8% and 57.1%, respectively. No patient transferred to open surgery. Postoperative adverse events included delayed bleeding (1 case), delayed perforation (1 case), delayed wall edema (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and retroperitoneal infection (1 case). Mean hospital stays were 4.1 ± 2.8 days and 6.2 ± 4.9 days, respectively. No metastasis or duodenal stenosis were detected during the follow-up period (64.8 ± 43.6 months and 61.3 ± 40.2 months, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in one patient with high recurrence risk at 56 months after EFTR. Conclusions: ESD and EFTR are safe, minimally invasive treatments for duodenal GISTs. Moreover, the EFTR technique may have advantages of completely resecting lesions originating from the deep muscularis propria layer, particularly lesions with extraluminal growth.

Indexed as

Endoscopic resection (ESD, EMRc, ...)Endoscopy Lower GI TractEndoscopy Upper GI TractPolyps / adenomas / ...Precancerous conditions & cancerous lesions (displasia and cancer) stomach

Identifiers

PMID40860693
PMCPMC12371658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.