Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860681›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Significance of the inflammatory-immune-nutritional (IINS) score on postoperative survival and recurrence in breast cancer patients: a retrospective study.

Yuan Wang, Wenxin Gao, Shan Wang, Jiajia Zhang, Jiaru Zhuang, Yibo Wu, Xiaoyan Huang, Jing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuan WangHuman Reproductive and Genetic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Wenxin GaoDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shan WangHuman Reproductive and Genetic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Jiajia ZhangHuman Reproductive and Genetic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Jiaru ZhuangHuman Reproductive and Genetic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Yibo WuHuman Reproductive and Genetic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Xiaoyan HuangDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jing HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Inflammation, immune system and nutritional status contribute significantly to tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of the inflammation-immune-nutritional score (IINS) on postoperative survival and recurrence in breast cancer patients and to analyze and compare the IINS, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer (BC) who underwent surgical treatment prognostic value. Methods: We executed a retrospective investigation of the clinical information and related materials of 200 female breast cancer patients who had their first breast cancer operation at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University between January 2017 and December 2018, and the IINS was built using the sum of preoperative categorical scores for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), lymphocytes (LYM), and albumin (ALB). In our survival analysis, we graphed the survival curves employing the Kaplan-Meier method. The effectiveness of pre-operative IINS, PLR, and PNI in PFS and OS of breast cancer patients were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox proportional risk regression analyses. Results: The median age of the patients was 55.5 years (range 34-75 years). In progression-free survival, the areas under the IINS, PLR, and PNI curves were as follows: IINS: 0.735, HR (95% CI) 0.037 [0.662-0.809], PLR: 0.724, HR (95% CI) 0.036 [0.655-0.794], PNI: 0.694, HR (95% CI) 0.038 [0.619-0.769]. In overall survival, the areas under the curves of IINS, PLR, and PNI were as follows: IINS: 0.738, HR (95% CI) 0.049 [0.642-0.834], PLR: 0.700, HR (95% CI) 0.039 [0.623-0.777], and PNI: 0.713 with HR (95% CI) 0.050 [0.615-0.811]. According to the findings, among patients with resectable breast cancer, preoperative IINS may be the most accurate indicator of both overall survival and progression-free survival. Conclusion: IINS may be a dependable marker for predicting postoperative survival in patients with breast cancer, and its prognostic value may be higher than that of traditional markers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsInflammationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAdultAgedC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPrognosisRetrospective StudiesC-Reactive ProteinBreast cancerInflammation-immunity-nutrition score (IINS)Overall survivalPlatelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)PrognosisPrognostic nutritional index (PNI)Progression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID40860681
PMCPMC12377354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.