Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860674›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Between a rock and a hard place: experimental assessment of recruitment patterns in a bathyal environment of the Low Arctic.

Sophie Wolvin, Jean-François Hamel, Annie Mercier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie WolvinMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-7338-0548
Jean-François HamelSociety for the Exploration and Valuing of the Environment (SEVE), St. Philips, Canada.
Annie MercierMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of larval transport and recruitment in the deep sea is crucial to the understanding of species distributions, community assembly, and the potential effects of anthropogenic activity and climate change on the maintenance of biodiversity. This study sought to better understand the role of substratum features in deep-sea larval recruitment at high latitudes. Four settlement frames composed of blocks of different substrata (mesh, plastic, stone, and wood) were deployed for 9 to 13 months at bathyal depths in the Labrador Sea (northeastern Canada). Colonial hydrozoans dominated as recruits, with one taxon (family Campanulariidae) colonizing all substratum types across all geographic sites. Other taxa, including arthropods, octocorals, and other anthozoans recruited only onto specific substrata and consistent microhabitats within them. Overall, higher morphospecies and phylum richness characterized the three-dimensional mesh substratum relative to other substratum types, whereas the complex surface area offered by projections in the plastic substratum had higher densities of individuals or colonies for all morphospecies combined. Wood, offered as a single elongated panel, was the most heavily colonized, whereas both mesh and stone hosted morphospecies not found on any other substratum type. Factors such as geographic location, depth, altitude above the sea floor, and orientation/obstruction of the frame, may have modulated recruitment patterns. These results provide foundational knowledge on larval recruitment patterns and early colonization by opportunistic hard-bottom benthic taxa in a poorly-studied region of the Eastern Canadian deep sea.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemHydrozoaAnimalsArctic RegionsLarvaColonizationEpibenthic macrofaunaHard substrataLabrador SeaLarval settlementNorth Atlantic

Identifiers

PMID40860674
PMCPMC12377359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.