ArticlePeerJ2025
Inoculation with
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Effects of Bio-Fertilizer Applications on Post-Harvest Fruit Quality in Soilless-Grown Tomatoes.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Biomass Seedling Trays Drive Rhizosphere Microbiome Restructuring and PGPR Enrichment in Tomato.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Greenhouse tomato cultivation has experienced significant growth in recent years. However, this production system requires high fertilization levels, relying mainly on synthetic agro-inputs. While their use meets the crop's nutritional demand, they present major limitations. Excessive application reduces absorption efficiency, increases soil salinity, and can contaminate water sources. Additionally, rising global fertilizer costs have made it necessary to seek efficient alternatives with lower contamination risks. In this context, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are a viable option to reduce inorganic fertilizer use. These microorganisms enhance nutrient availability and stimulate crop development. For this reason, the ability of five Methods: Preliminary Results: The Conclusions: The results position
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.