ArticlePeerJ2025
Assessment of upper limb motor control: establishing normative benchmarks for clinical applications.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of focal muscle vibration on sEMG activity during repeated elbow movements in healthy adults.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study presents and validates a methodology for assessing upper limb motor control using quantitative metrics derived from biomechanics and surface electromyography (sEMG). By combining kinematic and neurophysiological measurements, the study establishes normative benchmarks in healthy adults, which can offer a foundation for future clinical applications in populations with neuromotor impairments, which are commonly characterized by spasticity, involuntary coactivation, and restricted range of motion (ROM). A combination of clinical functional scales with the quantitative metrics presented here is expected to enable better evaluation of motor control. Materials and Methods: Twenty healthy adults performed elbow flexion-extension (FE) movements at three controlled speeds (42, 60, and 78 beats per minute (bpm)). The protocol involved recording sEMG signals of the biceps brachii and triceps brachii, with an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor, to compute four metrics: the range of motion (ROM), a derived angular velocity, the coactivation coefficient (CC), and muscle synergy. Movements were segmented into acceleration and deceleration phases to enable a phase-specific analysis, with a focus on both agonist and antagonist muscle activity during flexion and extension. Results: The results established normative values for each metric, showing alignment with previous results in the literature for healthy motor patterns. ROM values were consistent with the expected ranges for healthy adults ranging between normative values, with the angular velocity increasing proportionally to the speed of movement but showing greater variability at higher speeds. The CC analysis demonstrated distinct phase-dependent activation patterns, with higher values during flexion deceleration due to antagonist muscle stabilization requirements. The muscle synergy metric highlighted a balanced activation of the biceps and triceps, with minor secondary activation of the triceps during flexion to counteract gravitational forces. Discussion: The results validate the feasibility of this approach for quantifying motor control based on the quantitative metrics presented here. Normative values and the ability to detect changes in ROM, CC, and muscle synergy enhance the diagnostic potential of this approach in terms of identifying spasticity, coordination deficits, or abnormal neuromuscular patterns in clinical populations. This study establishes a comprehensive methodology for evaluating upper limb motor control, based on a combination of kinematic and neurophysiological data. These findings offer a solid foundation for developing advanced diagnostic tools and personalized rehabilitation strategies, with potential applications to conditions such as stroke, cerebral palsy, and other neuromotor impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.