Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860602›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025

Factors Influencing the Choice Between Surgical Intervention and Physiotherapy for Individuals Experiencing Lumbar Spine Issues: A Qualitative Study in Iran.

Bahram Amirshakeri, Leila Doshmangir, Hamideh Keyvani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bahram AmirshakeriDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Leila DoshmangirDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5197-8437
Hamideh KeyvaniDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-236X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spine disorders are a prevalent global health issue, with surgery and physiotherapy being the most common treatment options. Although many studies have explored the clinical outcomes of these treatments, little is known about the decision-making process from the perspective of both patients and healthcare providers in Iran. This process is shaped by a range of medical, social, psychological, and systemic factors. Accurately identifying these determinants and understanding their influence is essential for guiding patients toward informed and effective treatment decisions. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the factors affecting the decision to choose between surgery and physiotherapy as treatment options by Iranian patients with lumbar spine disorders using the views of the patients, health care providers and decision-makers. Methods: The study utilized semi-structured interviews to collect data from 27 stakeholders, comprising 12 patients, 9 healthcare professionals (surgeons and physiotherapists), and 6 policymakers/administrators from Tehran, East Azarbaijan, and Yazd provinces. Participants were selected through purposeful sampling with maximum variation to ensure diverse representation across age, gender, condition type, and treatment preference. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, with research rigor maintained through member checking, peer review, and inter-coder reliability assessments. Results: Four themes were identified; service provider factors (eg provider knowledge/expertise, provider preference), service recipient factors (eg trust, financial worries), health system/insurance-related issues (eg cost coverage, treatment facility distance), and societal/family influences (eg media depictions, traditional beliefs). For example, the decision for surgery of some patients was due to other health professionals promoting quicker results, whereas some opposed surgical advice because of past experiences. Conclusion: The decision to use surgery or physiotherapy for lumbar spine problems in Iran is multivariate. Interventions to facilitate shared decision-making and patient education can improve concordance between clinical recommendations and patient preferences. There is a need for culturally sensitive decision aids and policy changes.

Indexed as

decision-makingIranlumbar spinephysiotherapyqualitative studysurgery

Identifiers

PMID40860602
PMCPMC12375344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.