Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860598›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational social science2025

Simulating relational event history data: why and how.

Rumana Lakdawala, Joris Mulder, Roger Leenders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational social science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rumana LakdawalaDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9992-6035
Joris MulderDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Roger LeendersJheronimus Academy of Data Science, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many important social phenomena are characterized by repeated interactions among individuals over time such as email exchanges in an organization or face-to-face interactions in a classroom. To understand the underlying mechanisms of social interaction dynamics, statistical simulation techniques for network data at fine temporal granularity are crucial. This article makes two contributions to the field. First, we present statistical frameworks to simulate relational event networks under dyadic and actor-oriented relational event models implemented in an R package remulate. Second, we show how this simulation framework can address key challenges in temporal social network analysis through five case studies. The first study illustrates the necessity of simulation based techniques for model assessment, using a network of criminal gangs. The second shows how simulation supports social theory development which is illustrated via optimal distinctiveness theory. The third explores simulation for understanding the effects of network interventions. In the fourth study, we illustrate how simulation-based analysis can be used to assess the sensitivity of relational event models. The fifth study demonstrates how simulation frameworks can be used to make predictions about future relational dynamics. Through these case studies and software, researchers will be able to better understand social interaction dynamics using relational event data from real-life networks.

Indexed as

Actor-oriented modelsDyadic interaction modelsInterventionsModel fit assessmentRelational eventsSimulation techniquesTemporal social networks

Identifiers

PMID40860598
PMCPMC12370817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.